NFL 4th Down & 2-Point Analytics Engine
Should the coach Go for It, Kick a Field Goal, or Punt? Simulate any game situation with real-time NFL probability and EPA analytics.
1. Field Position & Distance
Yardline 1–992. Game Context & Team Strength
EPA Modeling🔥 GO FOR IT (+3.4% Win Advantage)
62.5%
+1.85 EPA Win: 48.2%55 Yds (68%)
+1.12 EPA Win: 44.8%Touchback
-1.40 EPA Win: 38.1%At the opponent's 38-yard line, a 4th & 2 attempt has a 62.5% historical conversion rate. Converting yields +1.85 EPA by extending the drive toward a touchdown. Punting would likely yield a touchback netting only 18 yards, while a 55-yard field goal attempt carries a 32% miss rate giving the opponent immediate field position at their own 45.
Win Probability Comparison by Decision Choice
Go for It vs Field Goal vs Punt Win %The Famous 2-Point Conversion Analytics Chart
ALWAYS Go for 2: Converting cuts the deficit to 6 (a field goal doesn't beat you, and a 2nd TD wins in regulation). If you fail, you can still go for 2 on your next TD to tie.
+5.2% Win ProbabilityGo for 2 on 1st TD: Down 8. If you convert, you only need 1 point on the 2nd TD to win. If you fail, you know you need 2 points on the 2nd TD to force overtime.
Knowledge AdvantageGo for 2: Cuts the deficit to 7 (a single standard touchdown & extra point ties the game without needing a 2-point conversion on the final play).
Key Decision PointClick "Run AI Coach Audit" to generate a tactical headset breakdown: play-calling recommendations (Tush Push vs Quick Slant vs Play Action), defense front analysis, and clock management strategy.
Zero Data Access: Your game simulations execute 100% locally in your browser. Zero Server Access
The 4th-Down Revolution: Why Modern NFL Coaches Stopped Punting
An analytical breakdown of Expected Points Added (EPA), field goal risk horizons, and why aggression wins championships.
The Fallacy of Field Position
For decades, traditional NFL coaches punted on 4th & 2 from the opponent's 40 out of fear of giving up good field position. Modern data science proved that an opponent starting at their own 15-yard line still scores on ~24% of drives, while converting a 4th down scores a touchdown on ~58% of drives. The expected value of aggression vastly dominates conservatism.
Frequently Asked Questions (NFL 4th Down & 2-Point Math)
What is the success rate of the Philadelphia Eagles "Tush Push" (Brotherly Shove)?
The Eagles' quarterback sneak concept converted at an astounding 92.5% rate on 4th & 1 between 2022 and 2024, far surpassing the NFL league average QB sneak rate of ~83% and standard running back plunges of ~67%.
How is Expected Points Added (EPA) calculated in football?
Every down, distance, and yardline in the NFL has a historical Expected Points (EP) value (e.g. 1st & 10 at the 50 has an EP of ~2.0). EPA measures the change in Expected Points from the start of a play to the end of the play. A 15-yard pass on 3rd & 10 generates positive EPA, while a 2-yard run on 3rd & 10 generates negative EPA despite gaining yards.